Psychology homework help. PSY 335 Which Would You Buy? Short Paper Guidelines and Rubric
This assignment will give you the opportunity to use available resources for evaluating and comparing different test instruments and to directly apply your
learning about test construction and reliability and validity to choose a particular test.
Prompt: Imagine that you have been put in charge of choosing a child behavior rating test for your agency, a center offering psychological treatment and
consultation to parents for a variety of behavioral and educational issues commonly seen in school-aged children. You will analyze the BASC-2 Behavioral and
Emotional Screening System and Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment behavior-rating tests. Using the ASEBA Catalog, the Pearson Clinical Catalog,
and Mental Measurements Yearbook, determine which of these two tests you would choose for the agency to buy: the Behavior Rating Assessment for Children
(BASC2) or Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment (ASEBA). State your choice and explain your decision. Be sure to justify and support your
recommendation with research.
In your short paper, the following critical elements must be addressed:
A thorough and detailed comparison of the BASC2 and ASEBA tests
A thorough and detailed explanation of the differences between the BASC2 and ASEBA tests
A statement and clear explanation of which test you are recommending your agency purchase
A well-supported justification using relevant research of why you are recommending your choice
Guidelines for Submission: Your paper must be submitted as a one- to two-page Microsoft Word document with double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman
font, one-inch margins, and at least three sources cited in APA format.
Critical Elements Exemplary (100%) Proficient (85%) Needs Improvement (55%) Not Evident (0%) Value
Comparison Meets “Proficient” criteria, and
comparison of similar aspects is
further supported with realworld examples
Clearly and thoroughly
compares similar, relevant
aspects of the BASC2 and
ASEBA tests; response is
comprehensive and logical
Compares aspects of the BASC2
and ASEBA tests, but response
lacks detail, is unclear, or
illogical
Does not compare aspects of
the BASC2 and ASEBA tests
22
Differences Meets “Proficient” criteria, and
explanation of contrasting
elements is further supported
with real-world examples
Clearly and thoroughly
contrasts different, relevant
aspects of the BASC2 and
ASEBA tests; response is
comprehensive and logical
Contrasts different, relevant
aspects of the BASC2 and
ASEBA tests, but response lacks
detail or is unclear or illogical
Does not contrast different,
relevant aspects of the BASC2
and ASEBA tests
22
Explanation Meets “Proficient” criteria, and
recommendation is further
supported with real-world
examples
Clearly articulates a
recommendation of either the
BASC2 or ASEBA test and
substantiates response with
specific detail
Articulates a recommendation
of either the BASC2 or ASEBA
test, but response lacks detail
or is unclear or illogical
Does not articulate a
recommendation
22
Justification Meets “Proficient” criteria, and
rationale of recommendation is
further supported with realworld examples
Provides a clear rationale of
recommendation, uses relevant,
scholarly research as support,
and substantiates response with
specific detail
Provides a rationale of
recommendation but response
lacks detail or is unclear,
illogical, and/or not
substantiated with relevant
scholarly research
Does not provide a rationale for
recommendation
22
Articulation of
Response
Submission is free of errors
related to citations, grammar,
spelling, syntax, and
organization and is presented in
a professional and easy-to-read
format
Submission has no major errors
related to citations, grammar,
spelling, syntax, or organization
Submission has major errors
related to citations, grammar,
spelling, syntax, or organization
that negatively impact
readability and articulation of
main ideas
Submission has critical errors
related to citations, grammar,
spelling, syntax, or organization
that prevent understanding of
ideas
12
Total 100%
